You know the concept of lazy loading images. It prevents the browser from loading images until those images are in (or nearly in) the browser's viewport.
There are a plethora of JavaScript-based lazy loading solutions. GitHub has over 3,400 different lazy load repos, and those are just the ones with "lazy load" in a searchable string! Most of them rely on the same trick: Instead of putting an image's URL in the src attribute, you put it in data-src — which is the same pattern for responsive images:
- JavaScript watches the user scroll down the page
- When the use encounters an image, JavaScript moves the
data-src value into src where it belongs
- The browser requests the image and it loads into view
The result is the browser loading fewer images up front so that the page loads faster. Additionally, if the user never scrolls far enough to see an image, that image is never loaded. That equals faster page loads and less data the user needs to spend.
"This is amazing!" you may be thinking. And, you’re right... it is amazing!
That said, it does indeed introduce a noticeable problem: images not containing the src attribute (including when it’s empty or invalid) have no height. This means that they're not the right size in the page layout until they're lazy-loaded.
When a user scrolls and images are lazy-loaded, those img elements go from a height of 0 pixels to whatever they need to be. This causes reflow, where the content below or around the image gets pushed to make room for the freshly loaded image. Reflow is a problem because it's a user-blocking operation. It slows down the browser by forcing it to recalculate the layout of any elements that are affected by that image's shape. The CSS scroll-behavior property may help here at some point, but its support needs to improve before it’s a viable option.
Lazy loading doesn't guarantee that the image will fully load before it enters the viewport. The result is a perceived janky experience, even if it’s a big performance win.
There are other issues with lazy loading images that are worth mentioning but are outside the scope of this post. For example, if JavaScript fails to run at all, then no images will load on the page. That’s a common concern for any JavaScript-based solution but this article only concerned with solving the problems introduced by reflow.
If we could force pre-loaded images to maintain their normal width and height (i.e. their aspect ratio), we could prevent reflow problems while still lazy loading them. This is something I recently had to solve building a progressive web app at DockYard where I work.
For future reference, there's an HTML attribute called intrinsicsize that's designed to preserve the aspect ratio, but right now, that's just experimental in Chrome.
Here’s how we did it.
Maintaining aspect ratio
There are many ways to go about the way we can maintain aspect ratios. Chris once rounded up an exhaustive list of options, but here’s what we’re looking at for image-specific options.
The image itself
The image src provides a natural aspect ratio. Even when an image is resized responsively, its natural dimensions still apply. Here's a pretty common bit of responsive image CSS:
img {
max-width: 100%;
height: auto;
}
That CSS is telling images not to exceed the width of the element that contains them, but to scale the height properly so that there's no "stretching" or "squishing" as the image is resized. Even if the image has inline height and width attributes, this CSS will keep them behaving nicely on small viewports.
However, that "natural aspect ratio" behavior breaks down if there's no src yet. Browsers don't care about data-src and don't do anything with it, so it’s not really a viable solution for lazy loading reflow; but it is important to help understand the "normal" way images are laid out once they've loaded.
A pseudo-element
Many developers — including myself — have been frustrated trying to use pseudo-elements (e.g. ::before and ::after) to add decorations to img elements. Browsers don't render an image’s pseudo-elements because img is a replaced element, meaning its layout is controlled by an external resource.
However, there is an exception to that rule: If an image’s src attribute is invalid, browsers will render its pseudo-elements. So, if we store the src for an image in data-src and the src is empty, then we can use a pseudo-element to set an aspect ratio:
[data-src]::before {
content: '';
display: block;
padding-top: 56.25%;
}
That'll set a 16:9 aspect ratio on ::before for any element with a data-src attribute. As soon as the data-src becomes the src, the browser stops rendering ::before and the image's natural aspect ratio takes over.
Here’s a demo:
See the Pen Image Aspect Ratio: ::before padding by James Steinbach (@jdsteinbach) on CodePen.
There are a couple drawbacks to this solution, however. First, it relies on CSS and HTML working together. Your stylesheet needs to have a declaration for each image aspect ratio you need to support. It would be much better if the template could insert an image without needing CSS edits.
Second, it doesn't work in Safari 12 and below, or Edge, at the time of writing. That's a pretty big traffic swatch to send poor layouts. To be fair, maintaining the aspect ratio is a bit of a progressive enhancement — there's nothing "broken" about the final rendered page. Still, it’s much more ideal to solve the reflow problem and for images to render as expected.
Data URI (Base64) PNGs
Another way we attempted to preserve the aspect ratio was to inline data URI for the src. as PNG. Using png-pixel.com will help with the lift of all that base64-encoding with any dimensions and colors. This can go straight into the image's src attribute in the HTML:
<img src="" data-src="//picsum.photos/900/600" alt="Lazy loading test image" />
The inline PNG there has a 3:2 aspect ratio (the same aspect ratio as the final image). When src is replaced with the data-src value, the image will maintain its aspect ratio exactly like we want!
Here’s a demo:
See the Pen Image Aspect Ratio: inline base64 PNG by James Steinbach (@jdsteinbach) on CodePen.
And, yes, this approach also comes with some drawbacks. Although the browser support is much better, it's complicated to maintain. We need to generate a base64 string for each new image size, then make that object of strings available to whatever templating tool that’s being used. It's also not the most efficient way to represent this data.
I kept exploring and found a smaller way.
Combine SVG with base64
After exploring the inline PNG option, I wondered if SVG might be a smaller format for inline images and here's what I found: An SVG with a viewBox declaration is a placeholder image with an easily editable native aspect ratio.
First, I tried base64-encoding an SVG. Here's an example of what that looked like in my HTML:
<img src="" data-src="//picsum.photos/900/600" alt="Lazy loading test image">
On small, simple aspect ratios, this is roughly equivalent in size to the base64 PNGs. A 1:1 ratio would be 114 bytes with base64 PNG and 106 bytes with base64 SVG. A 2:3 ratio is 118 bytes with base64 PNG and 106 bytes with base64 SVG.
However, using base64 SVG for larger, more complex ratios stay small, which is a real winner in file size. A 16:9 ratio is 122 bytes in base64 PNG and 110 bytes in base64 SVG. A 923:742 ratio is 3,100 bytes in base64 PNG but only 114b in base64 SVG! (That's not a common aspect ratio, but I needed to test with custom dimensions with my client's use case.)
Here’s a table to see those comparisons more clearly:
| Aspect Ratio |
base64 PNG |
base64 SVG |
| 1:1 |
114 bytes |
106 bytes |
| 2:3 |
118 bytes |
106 bytes |
| 16:9 |
122 bytes |
110 bytes |
| 923:742 |
3,100 bytes |
114 bytes |
The differences are negligible with simple ratios, but you can see how extremely well SVG scales as ratios become complex.
We've got much better browser support now. This technique is supported by all the big players, including Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Opera, IE11, and Edge, but also has great support in mobile browsers, including Safari iOS, Chrome for Android, and Samsung for Android (from 4.4 up).
Here's a demo:
See the Pen Image Aspect Ratio: inline base64 SVG by James Steinbach (@jdsteinbach) on CodePen.
🏆 We have a winner!
Yes, we do, but stick with me as we improve this approach even more! I remembered Chris suggesting that we should not use base64 encoding with SVG inlined in CSS background-images and thought that advice might apply here, too.
In this case, instead of base64-encoding the SVGs, I used the "Optimized URL-encoded" technique from that post. Here's the markup:
<img src="data:image/svg+xml,%3Csvg xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2000/svg' viewBox='0 0 3 2'%3E%3C/svg%3E" data-src="//picsum.photos/900/600" alt="Lazy loading test image" />
This is just a tad smaller than base64 SVG. The 1:1 is 106 bytes in base64 and 92 bytes when URL-encoding. 16:9 outputs 110 bytes in base64 and 97 bytes when URL-encoded.
If you're interested in more data size by file and encoding format, this demo compares different byte sizes between all of these techniques.
However, the real benefits that make the URL-encoded SVG a clear winner are that its format is human-readable, easily template-able, and infinitely customizable!
You don't need to create a CSS block or generate a base64 string to get a perfect placeholder for images where the dimensions are unknown! For example, here's a little React component that uses this technique:
const placeholderSrc = (width, height) => `data:image/svg+xml,%3Csvg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" viewBox="0 0 ${width} ${height}"%3E%3C/svg%3E`
const lazyImage = ({url, width, height, alt}) => {
return (
<img
src={placeholderSrc(width, height)}
data-src={url}
alt={alt} />
)
}
See the Pen React LazyLoad Image with Stable Aspect Ratio by James Steinbach (@jdsteinbach) on CodePen.
Or, if you prefer Vue:
See the Pen Vue LazyLoad Image with Stable Aspect Ratio by James Steinbach (@jdsteinbach) on CodePen.
I'm happy to report that browser support hasn't changed with this improvement — we've still got the full support as base64 SVG!
Conclusion
We've explored several techniques to prevent content reflow by preserving the aspect ratio of a lazy-loaded image before the swap happens. The best technique I was able to find is inlined and optimized URL-encoded SVG with image dimensions defined in the viewBox attribute. That can be scripted with a function like this:
const placeholderSrc = (width, height) => `data:image/svg+xml,%3Csvg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" viewBox="0 0 ${width} ${height}"%3E%3C/svg%3E`
There are several benefits to this technique:
- Solid browser support across desktop and mobile
- Smallest byte size
- Human-readable format
- Easily templated without run-time encoding calls
- Infinitely extensible
What do you think of this approach? Have you used something similar or have a completely different way of handling reflow? Let me know!
The post Preventing Content Reflow From Lazy-Loaded Images appeared first on CSS-Tricks.
from CSS-Tricks https://ift.tt/2RnBgkG
via
IFTTT
